Talk:Janine Joseph
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kdd038.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
Overall, I felt this article informed me on who Janine Joseph was. I did feel that the writers of this article focused mostly on the poet's earlier life rather than Janine Joseph's actual career, so my suggestion would be to capitalize more on her poetry. I also noticed some grammatical errors that should be an easy fix. I like the structure of this article and how the writers listed the author's poems and awards, as the reader I am more informed on the contributions of this poet. This article is in neutral tones as it should be according to Wikipedia's standards. I can't say I have any complaints about the article, I think it was informational and if I ever needed to know who this poet was, I would read this article.
Hannah Williamson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahwilliamson (talk • contribs) 19:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review. Caroline Long edit
I felt as though this article was incredibly well put together. I really liked how the creators of this article included a list of the poets work. This created a nice frame of reference for the reader to do some research. I also think the biography part of the article was well written in that it was simple and gave specific information. The only hinderance within the article was the fact that the references were not legitimate. When opening the article, the reader is met with a message stating that the page will be deleted because of a lack of sources that are directly from the mentioned person. CLong (talk) 04:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)caroline long
Peer Review edit
Overall, the article as a whole was very informative. However the meat of the background information did not appear to be neutral or, in my opinion, help contribute to the author's overall ideas. The focus on the early life, should have explained Joseph's writing influences, but it was not stated. The accolades for this author are great! I just think a little more time should have been spent on the influences Joseph has from her early life. I think a little bit of fine tuning would help make this article spot on! Great job guys! Alex Genest