![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Number96 13.jpg
editImage:Number96 13.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Original research
edit@Nette Cremer: - Just a friendly note to say that you seem to have introduced a large amount of original research into this article, which is against Wikipedia policy (see WP:OR). You will need to find independent sources for the material or you may find it is deleted without warning. I have tried to improve the article a bit, and found a couple of references. Over to you, but let me know if you need any help. Cheers, Tony Holkham (Talk) 00:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)