Talk:James Haim I. Bicher
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Spintendo in topic Request edit
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Request edit
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Please make use of the strategies listed at WP:CONTENTDISPUTE. |
content of the article is being continuously removed with no explanation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smarttbutt (talk • contribs) 19:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- This is a WP:CONTENTDISPUTE which should be handled using the dispute strategies listed there, rather than as a COI edit request. Needless to say, the prose used in the claims which are being removed leave a lot to be desired (e.g.,
"In 2004, in response to new charges, an Administrative Law Judge made a convoluted ruling that included both positive and negative findings"
). Perhaps if this section of text were to be improved, it would more easily solicit support from editors, and thus stand a better chance of remaining in the article.[a] Regards, Spintendo 22:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Notes
- ^ It's not easy to argue for the inclusion of text in an article which is poorly-worded, no matter how factual the information behind that problematic text may be.