Talk:James Charlton (activist)

material cut as a coatrack

He created a model of the disability rights movement that differentiates between a number of different kinds of organizations:

1. Local self-help groups, which provide counseling and moral support, and which often do not have a set agenda because their concerns focus primarily on group members;
2. Advocacy and program centers on a local level, which include non-residential Independent Living, non-profit organizations that educate the public and engage in advocacy and service;
3. Single-issue advocacy groups on the local level, which often align themselves with larger advocacy groups at higher levels;
4. Public policy groups, which can include educational centers and institutes, such as the World Institute on Disability;
5. Single-issue advocacy groups on the national level, which focus on a specific problem, such as accessible transportation or personal attendant services;
6. National membership organizations, which advocate using local chapters;
7. National coalitions and federations of groups, which are autonomous organizations that link and co-advocate, such as the National Council on Independent Living;
8. National single-disability organizations, the oldest type of disability group, which are focused on a particular disability,
9. Regional organizations, which are neither national nor local, such as a state group or a group based on a larger sub-region of a country; and
10. International organizations that have a global focus, such as Mobility International.

Switzer, Jacqueline Vaughn (2003). Disabled Rights: American Disability Policy and the Fight for Equality. Georgetown University Press. ISBN 0878408983.

Accotink2talk 01:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

This material can either be used in a new article or merged into Disability rights movement or maybe there is another article that could better accommodate this. I have posted a note about this on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disability#James Charlton article issue. Roger (talk) 08:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

The list appears valuable and, if it can be reliably sourced, it shouldn't disappear from Wikipedia!

Disability rights movement seems a good place for it, credited to Charlton, of course, if he's really responsible for it. I note that in List of disability rights activists, it says that he "developed a model of different kinds of disability activists groups in the United States" (my emphasis). Hordaland (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

If this biography expands enough the above section can be returned to the page, but as it is now it would totally dominate the article. What do we know about the man himself? Where was he born and raised? What do we know about his education and career? Does he have a disiability and if so what is it? Roger (talk) 12:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Is it really a "Model"?

Can one really call a simple list that sorts organisations into fairly obvious categories according to their activities a "Model"? The cited source calls it a "typology". Roger (talk) 13:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

The bot is insane! It has done the exact opposite of what it claims to have done. It removed all properly sourced biographical material and replaced it with material that was previously removed in terms of WP:COATRACK. Roger (talk) 12:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Rewriting the "Typology of Disability Rights"

I have Charlton's book in my hand. This is the summary of his "Typology of Disability Rights"

1. Local self-help groups
2. Local advocacy and program centers
3. Local single issue advocacy groups
4. Public policy groups
5. Single issue national advocacy groups
6. National membership organizations
7. National coalitions/federations of groups
8. National single disability organizations
9. Regional organizations
10. International organizations

Roger (talk) 08:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Charlton (activist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100622184635/http://www.ahs.uic.edu/ahs/php/content.php?sitename=dhd&type=7&id=138 to http://www.ahs.uic.edu/ahs/php/content.php?sitename=dhd&type=7&id=138

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)