Talk:J. T. White/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   Title in cite 1 should be capitalized to match other cites.

   It is capitalized as per the source. Are you sure that is not correct? Usually, unless the source is all caps, I use the same as the source.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

   See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles. People, especially journalists, are getting very sloppy about capitalization in article titles. Keep it in mind for any other nominations you might have in progress, especially for FAC.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

   Thanks for the correction. I shutter to think of how many refs I should go back and change.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

   Yeah, but remember that it's not critical at GAR, but only definitely so at FAC.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   You can't find a picture, even a fair-use one?

Fair use photograph cropped from 1947 Michigan team photograph has been added. Cbl62 (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

1. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: