Talk:Ivory pomegranate

Latest comment: 10 months ago by 2600:6C42:7400:F9:29D5:FFD7:B9B9:9969 in topic Update

Inscription edit

It says in that the inscription on the pomegranate is "Sacred donation for the priests in the House of G-D". When I read this, I do not read "Sacred donation", but rather, the 4 letters KHNM (כהנם) means "Priests". By saying קדש כהנם, this suggests the reading "Holy are Priests", and not "Holy Priests". The tenses that the text is written in suggests the full translation of "Holy are Priests - To the house of G-D". It is unclear if the text is a sentence (Holy are Priests to the house of G-D) but this is unlikely, seeing that bullae of that era have the inscription "To" (ל) before the name. This suggests two separate statements. -206.126.80.100 (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

We rely on reliable sources for our articles, if you can find one that supports this, please use it or post it here. But we can't use our own analysis or translations. Dougweller (talk) 08:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Try this: http://www.bib-arch.org/online-exclusives/ivory-pomegranate-01.asp. This says "“(Belonging) to the Temple (literally, house) of [G-D], Holy to the Priests.” " The only difference is that to say "to", you add the prefix "ל" before the word. There is no prefix, therefore, it is just "Holy [are] priests". The translation from the article is not literal.

206.126.80.100 (talk) 23:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Do we know who found the pomegranate? I ask this because Ron Wyatt claims to have found the pomegranate in 1982 (http://www.arkdiscovery.com/aoc-2.htm)Shutterbug99 (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ivory pomegranate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ivory pomegranate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Biblical Archaeology Review Article edit

In the November/December 2014 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review, Hershel Shanks has an editorial in which he discusses this further.

But I didn't feel like editing the article any.

Cheers.

Update edit

It has been years since they went back and now say it was not a forgery. 2600:6C42:7400:F9:29D5:FFD7:B9B9:9969 (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply