Talk:It Gets Better Project
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the It Gets Better Project article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Andrewmcfar.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
I found the Lead section of this article to be well-written. It provides a clear understanding of what the "It Gets Better Project" is along with a meaningful overview and key statistics. I thought the Structure of the article was logical. I felt that the "History" section was a bit short compared to the relative importance/length of the other sections in the article. I liked how the "Contributors" section was minimized as to not take up an unnecessary amount of space unless the reader wants. I thought there were a solid number of countries listed, but feel that some countries could use more information about them (like Italy which only has one sentence about it. The article was extremely well-cited, with 333 Sources that appeared to be reliable. The Grammar/Spelling seemed accurate to the best of my knowledge. Andrewmcfar (talk) 00:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Evaluate Wikipedia edit
Lead Section: Good lead that is concise and includes major points regarding the topic
Content: good content, explains origins and importance of movement
Tone and Balance: this is a neutral tone
Sources and References: Mostly uses news coverage, could use more peer-reviewed content, though the topic may be too recent
Organization and Writing Quality: starts with origins of movement, clear writing, but missing some up-to-date information, what has happened recently with the movement
Images and Media: Only one media clip of Obama, nothing from the organization or of the founders
Jakeforbes22 (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)