Talk:Invertebrate paleontology

Geology High‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Invertebrate paleontology is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Mid‑importance

Invertebrate paleontology is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Comment edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I deleted my prior comments here because they had become outdated. Dr.Bastedo 23:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomy edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've moved the taxonomic list to Taxonomy of commonly fossilised invertebrates, a page which could probably do with a better title. I don't think it really has a place in an article — especially as it's such a long (and incomplete) list. Verisimilus T 06:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

"See Also" needing cleanup? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The See also section in this article seems cluttered and overly detailed Many Paleo sites have concise boxes or tables beneath the main article that can more neatly present the details in a thematic way. Animalparty (talk) 21:29, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic