Talk:Interstate 280 (New Jersey)

Interstate 280 (New Jersey) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 25, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: Interstates / New Jersey Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

Interstate Highways

Locations

New Jersey

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the New Jersey task force in June 2011.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 280 (New Jersey)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --P C B 23:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The route description contains several short choppy sentences. Consider combining several of them to let prose flow. The route description also overuses the words "the road" and "the freeway". Consider finding other phrases like "the highway", "the roadway", or "it". "What is now the easternmost part of I-280 was legislated as Route 25A in 1939, a branch of Route 25 (US 1/9) from Jersey City west through Kearny and Harrison across the Passaic River and into Newark, connecting with Route 21 and Clifton Avenue." This seems like a very confusing sentence. Consider rewording or splitting into two sentences.
Combined a few sentences in the route description. Reduced repetitive wording in route description. Split sentence in history into two. Dough 48 72 02:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Consider getting more than two references for the route description.
Added a couple additional references to the route description. Dough 48 72 02:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Another sentence or two based on the route description in the lead would do.
Added sentence about major junctions. Dough 48 72 02:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I will put the article on hold to allow for the fixes.

Thanks for the review. I have replied to the above comments. Dough 48 72 02:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well done. I believe the article is now ready to pass.

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Interstate 280 (New Jersey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic