Talk:International Women of Courage Award

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Jochen64 in topic A question of formatting

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on International Women of Courage Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A question of formatting edit

The formats of the lists have been changing over the years. At this time, there are four different versions, as follows (names and countries anonymized):

  1. Jane Doe of Dunnowhere (2007–16, 2018)
  2. Kate Doe, activist for whatsoever, Utopia (2017)
  3. Lucy Doe (Nowhereland) (2019–22)
  4.   Ms Mary Doe (2023)

In my irrelevant opinion, I would prefer a consistent way of naming these ladies. Although the 2017 version seems to be the most informative one, it would require the most research. But in an encyclopedia, it may be expected to know the reasons why specific persons have received a certain award.

I therefore suggest to update the lists, by and by, in the following format

Any comments or better ideas? —Jochen64 (talk) 13:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply