Talk:Infineon TriCore

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Infineon TriCore, per proposal in discussion SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tricore → TriCore — The CamelCase is always used by Infineon in this way. Wikipedia uses this kind of CamelCase for other architectures e.g. PowerPC --Chjb (talk) 09:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move to Infineon TriCore, and disambiguate with triple core 65.93.12.101 (talk) 17:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't like this idea. It generates problems if Infineon changes it name, does a merge or sell this architecture of someone. Is the disambiguation with triple core really such a problem to prevent from a move. For other architectures the designer isn't part of the lemma name (C166, C167, PowerPC, x86, SuperH, V850, etc..... ) --Chjb (talk) 09:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

That is the same problem if the architecture is renamed. "tricore" is terribly generic. See this google search 65.93.12.101 (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tricore must be renamed to have better search result in Wiki. Infineon TriCore looks more suitable name. In case of name change update will be executed by the members like you and me - Mohan.rajk (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic