Talk:Infestation (album)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Professional Reviews edit

I agree that Sleaze Roxx is a great site for reviews on hard rock, glam and similar genres. It often is the only site which is brave enough to say things directly without telling lies (a good example of this is the review on Chinese Democracy). The point is that, though giving a positive review, no "star level" is given. So a 5 out of 5 rating is arbitrary. Keep the link but take the stars away. If anyone is not satisfied with this point please tell me, otherwise I'll take the stars away in a few days. FateForger (talk) 16:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Since nobody has disagreed, I've taken away the stars and kept the link to the review.FateForger (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I removed the metalholic review because it is the exact same review as the Mojo review, and the Mojo review appears to have been there first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.164.76.179 (talk) 00:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Infestation (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply