Talk:Inez Barron
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Bombastic" changed to Polarizing via the article sourced edit
The use of the term "Bombastic" is not only insulting, but it simply isn't true. Bombastic means: "high-sounding but with little meaning; inflated."
This is a direct attack against a principled leftist for having policy positions that dont fit the norm. The source that claims to back up the insult of being "bombastic" doesnt actually provide any proof at all. I'm going to remove this line until someone can provide a reason for the use of such a random, yet insulting term.
The Barron's are principled leftists and their policy positions haven't changed to warrant the use of the word bombastic.
I'm going to remove this line until someone can provide a reason why it should stay on the page, because at this point its being used as insult to hurt them politically for no verifiable reason.
The article used as a citation uses the word "polarizing" which is much more appropriate for this article, over the baseless insult of being bombastic. So I have changed it to the more accurate and appropriate term of "polarizing". Please do not revert this edit without first consulting this talk page. VisaBlack (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Please make sure your edits reflect Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Do not copy and paste information from other websites. Your writing above is not only replete with errors but probably contains about 60-80% unnecessary words, just get to the point or it's harder to read and thus harder to take one's complaints appropriately. Bear in mind, the Talk page is not a soapbox, so any opinion of yours about the subjects is not for discussion here, such as your opinion about their principles or leftism. Also, of note, your user page is not your personal website, nor is your Talk page the proper place for random maps, but whatever. Do you. But any further obvious copyright violations after the warning on your talk/map page will probably result in a block as Wikipedia takes those very seriously. JesseRafe (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)