Talk:Incendiary kite

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

WP:COMMONNAME edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I don’t think this is the most frequently used term to describe it. Some articles describe the kite as a firebomb, but very few call it “firebomb kite”. Onceinawhile (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Incendiary kite may be a bit better.Seraphim System ^(talk) 23:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

When I created the article - Firebomb kite one the google test. I agree incidenary kite wins now. Moving. Both are however used (e.g. [1]).Icewhiz (talk) 06:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

"arguably a war crime" edit

This phrase is wikipedians' original research based on the documents quoted. While it is arguably true, a wikipedian is not in a position to draw this condlusion. Please associate this phrase with a reliable source. 00:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Add topic