This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
A fact from In re Summers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Warning: law commentary without a degree.
A quick search through cases in Google Scholar indicates that Summers was quoted only twice by the supreme court since the 70s: briefly in Asarco Inc. v. Kadish (1989) regarding the definition of a "cause or controversy", and more at length in District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman (1983) on issues related to the abilities of the federal to review bar admission/disbarment decisions.
As far as I can tell, these and the nature/definition of judicial proceedings are the primary application of the case since the oath cases on the 70s: that issue seems at first glance not to have been raised at circuit level after 1980. Circéus (talk) 19:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
In re Summers was cited heavily in the 1950s and 1960s. But the Supreme Court's jurisprudence in this area has changed remarkably since the mid-1960s, and as the article points out it is not clear whether the Court see Summers as good case law or not. But it certainly has not overruled it. (Typical: The Court wants to uphold stare decisis, so even when it abandons a case it won't actually say so. You can count on two hands how many cases the Court has actually overruled.) - Tim1965 (talk) 01:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
