Talk:Immigration Street

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

change of far right to "conservative anti-immigrant groups." edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The reference [1] says "far-right groups" but that has been changed in the article to "conservative anti-immigrant groups." Far-right politics can be a variety of things. Opinions on the change please. Dream Focus 21:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, if there is consensus that changing it back to "far-right groups" would not make the wording too close to the source, then it can be done. I think it's obvious from context that the two are synonymous in this case: the difference as I see it is that "far-right" is generally (in clearly in the source in question) a WP:EUPHEMISM for "racist", but "race" is less clearly relevant in this case than "immigration", so that is the paraphrase I went with. But if others disagree I'd be happy to accept the will of the majority. @TonyBallioni: What do you think? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've tweaked it and restored far-right. Far-right is fine as a descriptor. The issue was that the construction and the rest of the words were the same. Now it has a different structure and vocabulary. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:35, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic