This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 21 April 2011 by reviewer Joey Roe (talk·contribs).
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've taken the print references on good faith in terms of notability and created the article, but there are a few issues with it. First is NPOV - words like "great" and "precious" don't fit Wikipedia's encyclopaedic tone, nor does the excessive use of honorifics, nor asserting that someone is a "reincarnation" without qualification (e.g. "In line with Buddhist doctrine, XYZ is believed to be the Nth reincarnation of..." would be better). All the specialised terminology also makes it difficult to read for the uninitiated, especially since there are few internal links. More inline sources would also be good. —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 17:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
