Talk:IEBus

User comment in article

The following user comment was removed from the article:

"Below are things I have found while researching for my '06 Acura TSX Navigation Touchscreen interface project wherein I am attempting to use the stock touchscreen system to control an in car computer. (Specifically a Via Epia M10000)

Angrycamel 04:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)"

Khatru2 00:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Some of the "Examples" read like adverts

Specifically, see "Renesas M16C family". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.166.221 (talk) 00:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Separate HBS page ?

In my view the short explanation paragraph on the Japanese Home Bus System (HBS) is somewhat outside the scope of this article, which is on IEBus. Would HBS justify its own page? The section at stake is rather short for a separate page though.

Further, following the WP:COI/WP:SELFPUB guidelines, I want to clarify that, from the three citations related to airconditioning devices using HBS, one of these citations refers to a github project which is maintained by myself (with valued contributions from other github users). This github project provides open source licensed software and an electronic circuit for interfacing to the HBS bus. It also contains reverse-engineered information on these protocols. The original discovery that these devices use HBS has been published on an Italian forum and is therefor acknowledged separetely as a citation. The two projects on github provide the most detailed publicly available information on the use of HBS by Mitsubishi and Daikin, for that reason I cited both even though one of them is a self-citation.

If a separate HBS page would be considered useful, some further information on the HBS protocol (baud rate, timing information, bit order, communication pattern, etcetera) could be added. Sources for that would be the newly added references as well as the earlier added citation to the Echonet specification.

Arnold1122 (talk) 19:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)