Talk:Hype in science
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Gilded Snail in topic Merge proposal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hype in science article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Merge proposal
editI think a merger or redirect to Pathological science may be the best way out. Bearian (talk) 19:04, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose They are two different topics and there's no evidence that they are the same. We have a separate complaint of synthesis. That currently seems weak but it would be exacerbated by forcing together two topics. Andrew D. (talk) 11:57, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- I was bold and merged them, but reverted my own redirect. Bearian (talk) 20:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. Also not clear on how a merge would help. I might take this over to AfD, since I'm not sure what page this could even be merged to. Gilded Snail (talk) 16:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: ENGL2650 Science Writing Origins, Ethics, and Emerging Genres
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 30 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Skrtberry (article contribs).