This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I found the above in this article. It was not properly indented and I fixed that. Now I'm wondering: are all three of the lines to the right of "with" supposed to be included as the object of the preposition "with"? If so, this should be formatter differently, lest it be misunderstood. Maybe like this:
Notice also that here I've used a left-aligned array rather than a "matrix". I've also adjusted the horizontal spacing next to the arrow with the superscript "p" by putting {{}\to{}} where {\to} had appeared. And I've relocated the period at the end of the sentence.
It was supposed to be the set of all morphisms from a geometrically connected smooth curve to the projective line, étale outside n points, whose automorphism group is isomorphic to G, hence the "outwards braces". I'm open to different suggestions since your reaction indicates to me that it's obviously not clear. Beranger Seguin (talk) 17:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply