Talk:Hurricane Dolores (1974)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleHurricane Dolores (1974) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 20, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Dolores (1974)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contribs) 00:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • "With peak winds of 80 mph (130 km/h), the storm made landfall near Acapulco." - Link mph and km.
  • "Once onshore, Dolores rapidly dissipated and was last noted on June 17." - This sentence is a bit confusing...You say it dissipated rapidly over land, and then you say that is was last noted on June 17, which is saying that it may not have actually dissipated, but was just last observed in that location...Additionally, the track map shows the last point as a hurricane, so I would say something like "Once onshore, Dolores moved north-northeast, and was last noted on June 17".
  • "Numerous roads sustained damage, separating communities form surrounding areas." - Typo
  • "Tracking westward, rapid development ensued the following day and the system was classified a tropical depression around 12 UTC." - Unlink "Tropical cyclongenesis (development)" as it is already linked in the lede.
  • "Shortly thereafter, satellite intensity estimates indicated further strengthening and the storm was cyclone upgraded to Tropical Storm Dolores." Extra word there.
  • "A banding eye-feature developed later that day, indicating Dolores to be near hurricane strength." - Same story as Tropical Cyclogenesis...Unlink as it is already linked in the lede.
  • "Around 00 UTC on June 16, it is estimated that the storm intensified into a hurricane, with sustained windspeaking at 80 mph (130 km/h)." - Instead of 00 UTC, try 00:00 UTC or 0 UTC...I know I am being picky, but that doesn't look right.
    • There's nothing wrong with it, 00 is the way to list hours and 00:00 is technically incorrect. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "Once onshore, rapid dissipation ensued and Dolores was last noted early on June 17." - Same deal as the second comment I made.

Overall, this article is good...As soon as you fix these issues, I shall pass the article. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Alright, being as you have fixed most mistakes, and plan to fix the last one soon, I am passing the article. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Dolores (1974). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply