Talk:Huna people

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 164.0.115.132 in topic Huna vs Hun

[Untitled] edit

Hello All,

Although I myself enjoy reading about Vikramaditya, I should note that since the article is about the Hunas, we should concentrate on a discussion of them. I do not want to unilaterally delete the discussion of the Raghuvamsa and the Mahabharata; however, I would recommend relocating them to the Chandra Gupta II/Vikramaditya article. Perhaps we could mention their early conflict with Indian Kings, such as Vikramaditya, and reference these two works. I will wait a little while before making the change myself. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Devanampriya 16:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The name edit

The name of this article is currently Hunas. This includes an English plural 's' at the end. It ought to be renamed to the historic term, Huna for clarity. Imc 10:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

vandalism edit

hi i would like to bring to your notice article about Huna people in which i suspect vandalism as it creates confusion with another article named White Huns also named as Hephthalite Empire, people are directly copying and pasting content from white huns to huna people article you can see this is 3 sections Origin, Yuezhi Theory, Religion one can easily find that this 3 sections are directly copied and pasted from white huns article and pasted here in huna people article but both article are different topic, white huns were people across hindu kush and huna people were people from north western india. i request admins to please look into this matter and resolve it. Sushilkumarmishra (talk) 07:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Huna vs Hun edit

I came to point out that Huns and Hunas are distinctly different peoples. I see someone is also saying that, so am adding my voice to encourage that distinction, please. I do not have the sources yet myself to do such editing, but will keep an eye on how changes progress. 66.8.136.18 (talk) 03:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is not a tribune, and not a pulpit. Of course, over time, the language-languages ​​of the subject differed from the original. But the fact that they came out of Central Asia during the Great Migration of Peoples that began from the Great Steppe from the 1st century AD. is a fundamental fact. Give authoritative sources, and do not be unfounded, you are ridiculous.--164.0.115.132 (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Titus KacanReply