Talk:Home Improvements

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Home Improvements is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Sources

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I have removed the tag requesting all sources to be cited. According to WP:V, a reliable, published source is required for "all material that is challenged or likely to be challenged". This article contains an infobox, a tracklisting and personnel. So far it contains no material likely to be challenged. Grimhim (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm challenging it. Blast Ulna (talk) 10:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see no challenge, just tagging. Do you have an real belief that the information is wrong? It doesn't appear to be, so I've removed the tags again. Wikidemo (talk) 11:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Wikipedia:Verifiability say:

"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.

Wikipedia:Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's core content policies."? Blast Ulna (talk) 11:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Home Improvements/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start class:

Y A reasonably complete infobox
N A lead section giving an overview of the album: current sentence and a half is hardly a WP:Lead section.
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

N All the start class criteria
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
N At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
N Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims

B class:

N All the C class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 01:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic