Talk:Home Alone/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 16:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I will conduct the review shortly. -- Matthew RD 16:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Well written: ✗ Fail.
2. Sources: ✗ Fail
3. Broadness in coverage: ✗ Fail. The article seems a little too short.
4. Neutral: From what I've seen, nothing is bias. ✓ Pass
5. Stability: Quite a lot or reversions, but only due to IP edits. No serious edit wars though. ✓ Pass
6. Images: One non-free image with appropriate tags and fair use rationale. I'm not sure about this image though, it does not have a proper fair use rationale.

Comments

• The lead mentions Culkin won an award, but it isn't mentioned in the reception section. The lead section should summarise the full article.
• The production section is short, as per the tag. All the production info is on the filming side. Isn't there anything on the casting? Writing? How the film was conceived?
• 3.5 bathrooms?
• I think the reception could do with a few more reviews. This article lists six reviews, but according to Rotton Tomatoes there are 40. A few more can't hurt
• There is an awful lot of content that is unsourced. I have editing in the citation needed tags on the end of each parapgraph that isn't referenced.
• What's the publisher and author name of Ref #2?
• Same with Ref #3
• Quite a lot of the refs do not have the author's names (though some may not have them included in the page itself) or proper publishers.
• Ref #13 is dead.

I'm afraid that's a fail. There are quite a few unsourced content and the production section is lacking. I also noticed that the nominator did not actually edit this article recently, which is not a good sign. After the comments are taken care of, take it to be peer reviewed again (last one was in 2008 and it was not a helpful one), then you may renominate it. -- Matthew RD 16:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Dddssddddderrrrrffffftty7utytttttttyrtrredsgafwruusydjdjfigogohfihcuhkfhjogihihigjjfghkgjcgkttie7wuwtusrururjeudgdbdgdhsffujkkjfsfhfudggffdddd

N. Nfhcggvgh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.89.45.152 (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)