Talk:History of microeconomics
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Banks Irk in topic Excessive quotations
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Change title to History of
edit"Evolution" should be associated with biological aspects, so this articles should be a history of... Dpleibovitz (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- History of microeconomics seems to be the best solution. Compare History of macroeconomic thought.--Tim Stamper (talk) 02:21, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Excessive quotations
editThe article consists primarily of long block quotes, which seems inappropriate and also rather unreadable. They quotes should be cut down and paraphrased per the Manual of Style MOS:QUOTE. Banks Irk (talk) 17:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)