Talk:Hierarchy of evidence
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Levels of evidence page were merged into Hierarchy of evidence. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Expert vs. scientific opinion edit
How does "expert opinion" relate to "scientific opinion"?
--Charley Coleman 02:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Proposed Merger edit
I propose that we merge levels of evidence to hierarchy of evidence. These two pages are on essentially the same subject. Wikiman2718 (talk) 21:55, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Template is in error edit
There's a template that says that this article disagrees with another article. Please see discussion. However, there is no discussion. How am I supposed to figure out in what way they contradict if no one's mentioned anything? 75.159.45.228 (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
History of Hierarchies of evidence edit
Christopher J Blunt wrote about the history of hie]rarchies of evidence, probably one of the only expert resources on this topic:[1][2]. This is unfortunately self-published (although he wrote a PhD Thesis on the topic, maybe there are duplicated information there), but may be of interest nevertheless, given the paucity of expert information on the topic. Best regards. --Lyrono (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)