This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe Organ, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pipe Organ on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pipe OrganWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe OrganTemplate:WikiProject Pipe OrganPipe organ articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Keeping my editorial instincts on leash, I've completed translating additional matetial from wiki fr; now have at it! Sparafucil 21:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The author of the article must have some reason for omitting Du Mont's birth date, 1610, which Marcelle Benoit judged sufficiently reliable to include it in her Dictionnaire (Fayard, 1992). Benoit is extremely learned and judicious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.217.182 (talk) 19:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
The 1610 date is given in the lead sentence at the very, very top of the article. Dumont doest come up on Grove online unless one uses the advanced search for Henry Du Mont; circa 1610 is given there, so there would seem to be a little uncertainty. I'd be most happy if there's more you can add from Benoit, though! Sparafucil (talk) 00:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
