Talk:Hemispherical photography

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Pmrich in topic References

References edit

Thats a lot of references. :) / Tense (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes it's very extensive and thorough (yeah!), but inline citations should be used with an appropriate template. minnecologies (talk) 00:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
References are in acceptable Wiki inline parenthetical style (see Wikipedia:Citing sources). Therefore I have reverted to previous version. Chamberlinda (talk) 19:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The reason for the number and presentation of the references appears to be that the entire page was plagiarized from: Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. 1990. Remote Sensing Reviews:5(1), 13-29. That, of course, is the one reference which doesn't appear on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conifere (talkcontribs) 19:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note that the 1990 review is the first source cited, that the review was largely derived from a 1989 publication that is in the public domain, and that there is also significant content from more recent sources published after the 1990. Pmrich (talk) 05:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply