Talk:Haw Par Villa

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Picture

I don't know why this article includes a picture of an SBS bus. I think it's not relevant to the article. Please comment in case you want to keep the picture with your reason. Otherwise I will delete the picture soon. Thanks and best regards --Shorty23sin (talk) 04:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haw Par Villa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110317031518/http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_560_2004-12-14.html to http://infopedia.nl.sg/articles/SIP_560_2004-12-14.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://app-pac.mica.gov.sg/data/vddp/embargo/6260896.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 17:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

The content that was added by Sarahtanyooroo, was a close paraphrasing of of journal article "Global and local interactions in tourism" doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00049-X. Peggy Tao, the author of the journal article, also citing "Singapore: Tourism in a Planned Context", another article by herself. However, "Singapore: Tourism in a Planned Context" only have 4 google hit including wiki. The actual article she wrote for the book "Tourism in South and Southeast Asia: Issues and Cases" (Google book preview), was "Singapore: tourism development in a planned context". Such odd shortening of the title of cited material is not a coincidence between adding content in wiki and the actual journal article Global and local interactions in tourism. Secondly, the sentence structure regarding Disney is almost the same, with the rest of the paragraphs seem also derived from the same journal article Global and local interactions in tourism. Matthew hk (talk) 17:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)