Talk:Harvey Spencer Stephens
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Rms125a@hotmail.com in topic Skeleton infobox removal
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Details of attack
editAt this diff an IP has removed well-referenced details of the subject's crime and conviction, suggesting that they justify only one more sentence in the article. What sentence do you suggest, and what details would you leave out and why? Richard Keatinge (talk) 15:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- I note that another editor has reinstated the details. Possibly, indeed, more details than are ideal for an encyclopaedic article. I propose to trim them. A bit. Richard Keatinge (talk) 13:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Skeleton infobox removal
editSkeleton infobox rv as per WP:MOS (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (infoboxes)): “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia's reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.” Quis separabit? 03:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)