Talk:Harry L. Carrico

Latest comment: 3 years ago by LordApofisu in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

The section on Loving v. Virginia starts out stating that the court had to rule as it did based on Supreme Court precedent, then immediately proceeds to say the exact opposite. Can someone more familiar with this than I please clean this up? LordApofisu (talk) 18:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply