Talk:Harold Brodkey

Bisexuality?

Notable Names Database says he admitted to sleeping with men decades ago. Can he be added to bisexual categories?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.137 (talk • contribs)

Yes, it would be fair to say he was bisexual, although he wouldn't have called himself that. He was resistant to strict categorization of sexuality.--ShelfSkewed Talk 14:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

IFD discussion

Image:Hbrodkey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hcoale (notify | contribs).

• Is User:Hcoale Howard Coale? And even if so, did he retain the rights to this image or sell them to the New Yorker? It seems more likely the magazine owns the copyright -Nard 20:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I emailed the user to see if he could clarify. His response indicated that he is the artist, and that his recollection is that he drew the image for the New Yorker, but they ended up not using it. I will see if he will send an email to OTRS.--Kubigula (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Follow up. I've received no further response from the user. So, at this point we have a user who says he is Howard Coale and that he has the legal right to license the picture as he has. My feeling is that we accept that barring any evidence to the contrary. I'd be happy to forward the email to OTRS if that would help.--Kubigula (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
• Image kept based on WP:AGF -Nv8200p talk 03:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I am making a few small changes, nothing significant. Gregory Feeley (talk) 00:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Description and categorization of works

Two quibbles with this article, which could use a lot of help (image is great -- until Wiki lawyers take it down.)

Runaway Soul does use parts of Stories in a Classical Mode. At least part of the long sex story (Orra/Ora) in a changed form, and more, I think.

Women and Angels should be listed under Short Stories, since it contains three short stories. It is a special publication for the Jewish Publication Society but not sure why it rates the dubious Miscellaneous distinction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrimbleGrumble (talk • contribs) 20:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

If you can correct the information about The Runaway Soul and Stories in an Almost Classical Mode with a concrete example or two, please do. That would be great. (Although I love his early work, I never could get through The Runaway Soul.) Women & Angels is a tough one, because it's neither fish nor fowl. "Ceil" certainly is a short story, but "Lila" and "Angel" I would call novellas. I suppose we could change the first category from "Short-story collections" to "Story collections" and accomodate W&A.--ShelfSkewed Talk 21:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Excessive criticism

The ciriticism section included by IP 74.73.177.95 in Feb 2012 is exclusively negative, it would be good to balance it with positive criticism. He did receive the O. Henry Award twice, so there must be some. --MarioS (talk) 13:12, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Agreed, and this is still the case, oddly. Sojambi Pinola (talk) 18:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Harold Brodkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716230857/http://www.brucebawer.com/big%26bad5.jpg to http://www.brucebawer.com/big%26bad5.jpg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101104153754/http://www.robotwisdom.com/jorn/brodkey.html to http://www.robotwisdom.com/jorn/brodkey.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)