Talk:Hannah Tompkins

Merge discussion

It has been suggested that this page be merged. An AFD is currently in progress. The information from this article is being added to another article regardless of consensus to keep or delete to clean up 2009 backlog. If this article remains no change. If this article is dleted information is laready merged and no redirect will be needed.--Amadscientist (talk) 14:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Madscientist, hold on. If the AfD ends with anything but merge, we should simply delete the tags without any further comment. A lack of merge votes in an AfD is a consensus not to merge. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 21:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Slow down there sir. Regardless of this AFD, the other article need not suffer and the content may be added with no controversy. The AFD here means no further merge proposal attempts can take place here and I stopped and placed a note. I am also moving their discussion for this move to this talk page as well as the target page was not the proposed merge, this article was.--Amadscientist (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Merger proposal

_{Original merge discussion from target article talk page Talk:Daniel D. Tompkins}

There's a separate stub article about Daniel Tompkins's wife Hannah, but, given the level of development of that article and the fact that Hannah Tompkins seems to have had little historical significance outside being the Veep's wife, I propose that the information in the Hannah Tompkins article be merged into a "Family" section in this article and [[Hannah Tompkins be redirected here. Thoughts? --Dynaflow babble 15:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, merge! Kraxler (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

As the Wife of the Vice President of the United States perhaps she should have her own page.-Emargie (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Women are people too! With reference made to her "office" as "Second Lady" of the United States it seems appropriate to me that she has her own small page. Gevan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.209.77 (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

I think this is one case where WP:NOTINHERITED need not apply. I think the US Second Ladies are notable by default, and that a merger is not appropriate. PKT(alk) 11:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

The Title of the stub should be renamed to Hannah Minthorne Tompkins. Hannah Tompkins was an American artist (1920-1995) known for her works on Shakespearean themes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beflat (talk • contribs) 20:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Problem solved because the artist's article title was changed to Hannah Tompkins (artist). PKT(alk) 11:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I say merge, nothing is notable by default and WP:NOTINHERITED does indeed apply 71.192.108.214 (talk) 18:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Why not? The Article seems to be a stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.191.49.80 (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

The Wife of the Vice President of the United States page mentioned above has a list of all of the "Second Ladies", with links to articles; none are currently "red", so elsewhere in WP, the standard is being set that the "office of Second Lady" merits an article, albeit of stub length, if that's all the content that is available. Lini (talk) 11:25, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

References

Photo needed

• possible leads [2] - references "Portrait of Mrs. Daniel D. Tompkins (Hannah Minthorn, 1781-1829) by an unidentified artist. Gift of members of the family of Airs. Daniel D. Tompkins." Not available online.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Here she is [3].--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)