Talk:Hale v. Henkel

Latest comment: 7 years ago by DaltonCastle in topic Two suggestions for future improvements

Two suggestions for future improvements edit

DaltonCastle, thanks so much for creating this article; Hale is an incredibly important (and interesting) case, and I am happy to see that it is now covered in our Encyclopedia. I have two suggestions for future improvements for this article:

  1. When citing to the Court's opinion, could you please include page numbers for the page of the United States Reports on which the cited material appears? Also, per MOS:LAW, I recommend using Bluebook citations. You can find a template at Template:Ussc.
  2. I would recommend covering the Fourth Amendment that were discussed in this case.

Thanks, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey thanks for the advice! I am currently preparing another article but I can get around to it eventually. Glad you like it so far. DaltonCastle (talk) 05:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply