Talk:Guise (name)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 24 April 2023

Requested move 24 April 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 22:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


Guise (name)Guise (surname) – There were a lot of surname entries and a single given name entry here, so I moved the latter to Guise (disambiguation)#People. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Festucalextalk 09:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. EggRoll97 (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment. WP:APOTITLE is relevant here, but not sure how to apply it in this case. Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. APOTITLE doesn't give much helpful guidance here, but it makes sense for someone who wants to find this single person with the given name to only have to go disambiguation -> the person, as opposed to disambiguation -> name -> person. Diverging Diamond To the left! To the right! 14:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. I don't see what difference it makes if there's one name or a hundred. It's still a name and belongs on a name page. It's only a partial title match for a dab page, so does not belong there, unless the person was commonly known by the single name "Guise". APOTITLE says use "(name), if the article covers both". "Name" is the more inclusive disambiguator, and there's certainly no need for a split here. Station1 (talk) 18:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.