 | Grigory Panchenko has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 27, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Grigory Panchenko/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Just a nudge. Kges1901 (talk) 11:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Both images need US PD tags
- Done
- responsible secretary of the party bureau What does this mean?
- Clarified
- Are any dates for his early ranks available?
- There aren't precise dates available, but the Red Army didn't introduce traditional ranks until 1935, before that commanders were referred to be their position title. All that's known is that he was a captain (equivalent to US Army major) by 1937 (and possibly from 1935), major (LTC equivalent) at some point, and colonel by 1940.
- Link Repola
- Done
- Isaev needs its title translated
- Done
- Nicely done--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)