Talk:Goodfood Market

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 March 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Canada: Quebec / Montreal Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).

Why I'm Submitting this Article to AFC edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm an experienced editor in creating this sort of article, and I have no connection to the company. I believe this article easily meets WP:CORPDEPTH, with several in-depth articles about it in national newspapers, such as the Globe and Mail and the Financial Post (not all of which are quoted in the article, see [1], [2]). I could just move the draft to article space, but I am looking for an ally in any potential future AfD discussion. -Mparrault (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why I'm re-submitting this article edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I'm re-submitting the article with minimal changes. It already had significant negative content about the company, although not in the lede (now it does). I see no evidence that the original reviewer actually read the article in its entirety. -Mparrault (talk) 15:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

In addition, the reviewer made no comments at all about any of the sources in the article, which are all major, independent newspapers/magazines -Mparrault (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notable per WP:LISTED and the coverage by Globe and Mail etc Legacypac (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic