Talk:ZeRo

(Redirected from Talk:Gonzalo Barrios (esports player))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mlb96 in topic Neutrality tag

disamig needed

edit

Because zero can mean many things it does need a disamiguation. Valoem talk contrib 20:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

WP:STAGENAME

edit

In this case we would apply WP:COMMONNAME, the person in question is not a performer, but a competitor. Second we look at his gamer tag, which is ZeRo. This is an extremely common term, Gonzalo Barrios would therefore be more appropriate. Valoem talk contrib 05:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Zero" is a common term, but "ZeRo" (with the R capitalized) isn't. MediaWiki software distinguishes between the two so for now "ZeRo" seems okay for namespace.--Prisencolin (talk) 02:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

53 or 55 streak?

edit

It says that ZeRo's undefeated streak was both numbers in the article, does that work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Golden11535 (talkcontribs) 14:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gonzalo Barrios (eSports player). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ace (video gamer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Gonzalo Raúl Barrios Castro" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gonzalo Raúl Barrios Castro. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Gonzalo Raúl Barrios Castro until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. (CC) Tbhotch 19:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Retraction of admission

edit

According to Inven Global today,

ZeRo also addressed a confession he had shared where he accepts the accusations as facts. According to ZeRo now, that was actually a "suicide letter" written during a "tremendous mental breakdown." The former top Ultimate player admitted that he planned to take his own life after sharing the document. Mental illness and depression is something he's struggled with for some time — and he has attempted suicide in the past.

Should this be added to the lead, should the admission be removed, or should something else happen? GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

No, because the lead doesn't even talk about his suicide attempt. At most it belongs to ZeRo_(gamer)#2018–present:_Partnerships,_sexual_misconduct_allegations_and_cut_ties. (CC) Tbhotch 21:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just clarifying, I'm not at all in support of adding anything about any suicide attempts to the lead. I removed the line about the admission from the lead and I'd like to gather opinions on whether it should be kept like that, if that removal should be restored with an additional sentence stating factually that the admission was retracted, or if the removal should be restored with no mention of the retraction in the lead beside it. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2021

edit

Change the status of ex-girlfriend to wife. On instagram they are confirmed to be married. https://www.instagram.com/zerowondering/ <--- zero's instagram https://www.instagram.com/healinghalo/ <--- Vanessa's instagram https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OjEwwOYJvs <--- video where this was stated and shown 198.52.40.111 (talk) 00:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  melecie  t - 00:14, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Note: At the time, they were not in a relationship, per the cited source. However, it is true that they later got married per the Instagram bios and video. For accuracy, I'll change the sentence in question to "then ex-girlfriend Vanessa." As for mentioning his marriage, I'll hold off on it for now as Instagram bios are not really reliable sources even in an WP:ABOUTSELF case. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Error

edit

The reason why he quit competing is totally wrong. He quit to create content and his YouTube channel in 2018, absolutely not because of allegations 2A04:CEC0:107A:B220:0:19:612A:F01 (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Excepting that he was a member of Tempo Zero in 2020. (CC) Tbhotch 20:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality tag

edit

There is currently a neutrality tag in the section which describes the allegations. It was added by an IP user in October without an edit summary or a talk page discussion. While I don't know what the page looked like back then and have no real desire to check, the section reads entirely neutrally to me as it is now. Is it safe to remove this template? Mlb96 (talk) 06:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's been a day and no one has commented, so I'm going to assume that no one cares and just remove it. Mlb96 (talk) 06:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply