Talk:Gizab District

Add discussion
Active discussions
WikiProject Afghanistan (Rated Stub-class)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daykundi or Uruzgan Province?Edit

On 8 June 2006 the United Nations quoted Gizab District as still being in Daykundi Province. Skinsmoke 11:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with this fact totally! Even so, I checked evey up-to-date information/maps/other media that involed the representation of the district. I found some maps of Afganistan with all its 34 provinces and 398 districts (in English and in Dari Pashtu) and it displays that Gizab District is still located into Daykundi Province ever since it was transferred from Oruzgan Province. jlog3000 (talk) 21:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gizab District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Note to selfEdit

Reminder to add [1] to this article when I get around to it, unless somebody else rewrites this first. --Danre98(talk^contribs) 04:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)