Talk:Giveh

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Originally, I prepared this short article for CHHTO of Kermanshah website. As I am in charge of the website, I see no problem to use that article with minor changes here as a start on an article on Giveh. By the way on the homepage of the site[1] one could find my email and name in "about us".Rahman Amiri 04:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

You cannot use your own thoughts as a reference edit

Hi,
Unfortunately, your article is incorrect and misleading. Mainly because klash and giveh and two separate footwears and they are not the same. Also, you must find proper references to your claims, and an article that "you" wrote in another site does not constitute a proper reference. A fair reference to what I say is http://en.ostan-kd.ir/Default.aspx?TabId=63#p2-5-3. However, I would prefer a non-governmental third party source, or possibly a peer reviewed article from an accredited journal. I will go ahead and tweak your article a bit, and will do some research to find a proper reference next week. Cheers! Gbeebani (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giveh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply