Talk:George's Quay Plaza
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Guliolopez in topic Merger proposal
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merger proposal
editI think that the articles 'George's Quay Plaza' and 'Georges Quay' should be merged as it would make more sense as they both essentially cover the same area. Any objections to doing this? ShaneMc2010 02:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. No objections. I think this makes sense. Guliolopez (talk) 12:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Are there any other opinions on this? If not, I'm going to action. Or, at the very least look at a rewrite of some aspects of the George's Quay Plaza article. (Not least because it refers to the Customs House as a "tourist attraction". While it's a notable building, photogenic, and whatnot, it's not what would normally described as an "attraction". I'm not even sure why it needs to be referenced at all in an article that deals with an unrelated set of buildings....) Guliolopez (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Last call? Guliolopez (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Hadn't heard any objections or input in the 2 or 3 years since originally raised, so went ahead with the merge. Guliolopez (talk) 20:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Last call? Guliolopez (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Are there any other opinions on this? If not, I'm going to action. Or, at the very least look at a rewrite of some aspects of the George's Quay Plaza article. (Not least because it refers to the Customs House as a "tourist attraction". While it's a notable building, photogenic, and whatnot, it's not what would normally described as an "attraction". I'm not even sure why it needs to be referenced at all in an article that deals with an unrelated set of buildings....) Guliolopez (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
