This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
His quote, "The system is extremely complex. It's like it was designed. There's a huge intelligence there. I don't see that as being unscientific. Others may, but not me.", taken out of context as it is in the article, is plain (and intentionally? – it’s really hard to assume good faith here!) misleading. Myers has made it abundantly clear later on that he does not believe in either God or creationism, nor was his quote meant that way. Since I’m unable to find the relevant interview to back me up, I’m leaving the article as is. But I strongly recommend removing the section: Without context, the quote is worthless anyway, and there is no way it can be interpreted differently than as an endorsement of intelligent design. And that would be a gross misrepresentation.--87.77.158.189 (talk) 08:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
was removed, done Plehn (talk) 20:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
