Talk:Geek and Gamer Girls

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Hangon rationale edit

It is my contention that this work meets the criteria for albums, singles and songs due to its coverage in a wide variety of electronic publications, most notably MTV.com and Star Wars Blog.com. These sites are reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

If it is Wikipedia’s contention that these publications are not reliable, I would ask then what publications they do deem reliable, and I would then ask whether these publications typically cover geek related subject matter. Furthermore, if there are no geek oriented publications which meet Wikipedia's standards, I would be forced to conclude that Wikipedia is demonstrating a prejudicial bias against geek culture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NorthernDragon (talkcontribs) 13:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

You probably want to post this at the AFD discussion page as well. Yoenit (talk) 14:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

List of references edit

I fixed some stuff in the list of references recently merged into the article, but there are several problems with it. By far the most important one right now is that it seems to be original research, which goes against the very basics of wikipedia. We are only allowed to rephrase what reliable sources say, not draw our own conclusions based on the lyrics. Unless a source happens to mention the lot of them I therefore propose we trim the list to the references that are mentioned by the sources and turn them into prose instead of a list. Yoenit (talk) 08:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I'm deleting it from the article. The entire thing needs to be restructured anyway. -AngusWOOF (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geek and Gamer Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geek and Gamer Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply