Talk:Gaudiya Nritya

The poet Jayadeva, is from Odisha. Article is already in wikipedia. Please don’t relate him to this baseless article. His was not a dancer . please stop propagating by misusing famous personality . its wikipedia not a bongpedia.

Untitled

When we are talking about a respected poet, who's known for spreading love, we should be careful about our behavior and way of talking. If someone is objecting something or claiming something she/he should post that on the page he/she supporting for, not in Gaudiya Nritya page. We bengalis are known for our culture and knowledge in literature. So, for a person's immature behavior we would never call Wikipedia as Odipedia, nor we would ever say anything against them on their page. Because we have our things to be busy with. Wikipedia members even would not be agreed with such language that the previous person used! We should not forget that before anything we are Indians.

Same thing applied to your community when you are making dirty to reality regarding Jayadeva . and we claiming about you culture literature but have you ever know about Strong Odiya culture and their literature. They have India’s oldest Classical dance , their language is Classical Language as approved minister of culture as a only language from Indi Aryan family. Their music is unique and 3 among the classical music in India. Their painting is Patachitra is classical painting. The heritage of Odisha is classical. Classical literature of Odia is started from 11th century with strong ornamental creation. You can feel good what ever with you but can not make down by words with out knowing fact. Yes we are Indian and feel proud to be Indian but no one should make down to THE SOUL OF INDIA…..THE LAND OF ART AND CULTURE… — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.165.63.132 (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

References

Copyvio allegations

It is alleged that the text is copypaste from http://www.gaudiyanritya.org/history-2/. However, it seems to be vice versa. The text in dispute exists since at least 2011 [1], while Gauddr Media, the author of the site was founded in 2013. [2]. Please present other sources from where the article may be copied. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

See the second and third edits on the article. —SpacemanSpiff 13:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff: Removing that part and removing copyvio notice. Please do not revert for some time. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:35, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

As long as you check the whole article I have no problem, if not the copyvio note is still needed for someone to verify that there aren't any remaining issues. Please also log the action at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2013 October 25. —SpacemanSpiff 13:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff: Some sentences match http://www.westbengaltourism.gov.in/web/guest/dance, but it is unclear if wikipedia copied from government site or vice versa. Also, Chhau dance's lead also matches the site, which compels me to question if the site copied from wikipedia. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

It's possible that the WB tourism site copied from here, but the more likely explanation is that both our article(s) and WB tourism copied it from elsewhere as that is typically the case with a lot of our "matches" with government sites. I'm going to ask @Moonriddengirl: to check this out and also to see if revision deletion is required here as the article started as a copyvio. Also, the Om Gupta encyclopaedia shouldn't be used as a reference as that book is a copyvio mirror of multiple sources including Wikipedia (this has been discussed at RSN, WT:INB and at the mirrors talk boards at length). —SpacemanSpiff 03:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Protection

I've just fully protected this article due to the ongoing edit warring. Please discuss the matter here instead of continually reverting. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Thankfully other editors have realised that this article is one big bloody HOAX concocted by this fraud called Mahua Mukherjee. This botanist who curiously heads the dance dept of Rabindra Bharati without any formal training, has opened franchisees and fake schools to commercialise and promote her "invention". There is no INDEPENDENT sourcing for this at all. There is one G-book result by a Western academic which trashes this dance form, but i can't find it now. This page should be speedily deleted, if not for anything else but for the sheer number of sockpuppets and new accounts of Gadurr being opened to POV push here.

Criticisms of Mahua Mukherjee "Indian performing arts: a mosaic" Utpal Kumar Banerjee- Harman Publishing House, 01-Jan-2006 - Art - 220 pages, see page 79. And also "Worlding dance" Susan Leigh Foster, Palgrave Macmillan, 15-Jul-2009 - Drama - 209 pages, at page 133 speaks of Mahua Mukherjee's attempts to legitimise her so called dance form. Notabede (talk) 10:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gaudiya Nritya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021225635/http://www.westbengaltourism.gov.in/web/guest/dance to http://www.westbengaltourism.gov.in/web/guest/dance
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021161953/http://indiaculture.nic.in/indiaculture/scholarship-to-young-artist.html to http://indiaculture.nic.in/indiaculture/scholarship-to-young-artist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)