I've read your reply to me and it comes across as a thinly-veiled insult, arrogantly snobbish without a lot to be arrogant and snobbish about. So I'm going to be rather blunt with you.

You haven't mentioned a single fact I'm not aware of; what you haven't made clear is the relevance of anything you've said. Most of what you state there is opinion, not "knowledge", and irrelevant opinion at that, given that it's got absolutely nothing to do with Wikipedia's deletion policy. You are basically just saying you disagree with it. That won't go over well, especially given your obvious ignorance of it.

The fact that you failed to take the two seconds it would have taken to format your response properly does nothing to enhance your credibility, especially when conjoined with an attempt to make yourself sound like some sort of intellectual wonder. And votes from anonymous IPs don't count, anyway.

You might notice I'm actually on the same side of the debate as you. I am taking you to task anyway because you are, at the moment, an embarassment to that side. PurplePlatypus 08:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've now gone over your additions to the article as well. There wasn't a single one that didn't have a blatant factual or English-usage error. Most of them detracted from, rather than improving, the entries in question; some, like the point about StP and Darksteel Colossus, are exactly the sort of thing people mean by fancruft. Are you trying to save the article, or sabotage it? PurplePlatypus 08:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean by "if you try to misuse the information we can easily catch you." edit

Is that a threat? Dougweller (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please read WP:NPOV. You are clearly editing to remove Bengal from a number of articles, and in the case of Jayadeva this is still a disputed subject no matter what the government says. Wikipedia is not going to take sides in this dispute. Dougweller (talk) 15:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013 edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Hindu temple. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Njol #T·C 13:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Further attacks on Bengalis will result in longer blocks. Dougweller (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! 2AwwsomeTell me where I screwed up. See where I screwed up 11:16, 16 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 15:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cultural Zones of India. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Continual adding of fact tags when reliable sources have been added is clearly disruptive. Perhaps you have a problem with English - 'known as' is clearly sourced and does not mean 'is'. Dougweller (talk) 14:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Classical language may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[[[Odia language|Oriya]](language of [[Kalinga (India)]]/[[Utkala Kingdom]]/[[Koshal]] and morden [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Shovon76. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Charyapada, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Shovon (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2014 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Outline of ancient India, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 12:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2014 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nanda has been reverted.
Your edit here to Nanda was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://sahubrahminmatrimony.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/history-of-oriyaodisasahubrahmin/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:09, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of national independence days because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.