Talk:Gareth Roberts (writer)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 68.196.162.105 in topic "Transphobia"

Shada

edit

He wrote the novelisation of Shada, shouldn't this be included in his bibliography? 212.149.216.106 (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gareth Roberts (writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Transphobia"

edit

The claim that Roberts's conduct "meets the definition" of "transphobia" is original research and inappropriate for Wikipedia. We cannot be the ones to decide that. The Wikipedia article can only present what secondary sources have said on the subject. However, even with the existence of sources that have made such a claim, the section title (which was "Transgender" without anyone complaining for a long time before an anonymous editor changed it to "Transphobia") is not the place for it; there is no space to put a citation or a balanced presentation of multiple views in a section title. That stuff belongs in the paragraph below, with the appropriate citations, and the section title must remain neutral. BLP issues are also implicated: we must be even more careful in this biography of a living person than we would be in some other article, to make sure that the encyclopedia does not take a position of its own. 2607:FEA8:129F:E389:0:0:0:8E3D (talk) 21:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Well no, -the controversy concerns his comments being called out as transphobic (which they very clearly objectively are, but whether or not you agree that is explicitly what the controversy is), calling it 'transgender controversy' makes it sound like the the concept of transgender is the thing that's controversial rather than his comments being transphobic.219.88.68.195 (talk) 00:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
He's transphobic. That is not in question. Only transphobes make transphobic comments, and he has. Hence, he's a transphobe. Ignorant hateful bigots are defined by the ignorant hateful bigotry they spew. He spews it in spades. He's a terrible person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.162.105 (talk) 13:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Personal life" section

edit

"Roberts is gay." That's it, the entire section?! Equinox 21:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply