Talk:Garden World Images

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Independent, notability?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What does the "world's largest independent" image supplier actually mean? What does independent refer to? Who is not independent? I am trying to establish notability for this page - if I can't then I will propose it for deletion. As it currently stood it seemed like an advert. Jenafalt (talk) 17:08, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tag removal

Latest comment: 15 years ago8 comments5 people in discussion

Please do not keep removing the conflict of interest and notability tags. To establish notability sources need to be verifiable - the sources added today are not verifiable. Could you please add a link that can be checked. Recent edits are also strongly suggestive of a conflict of interest as the editors seem very familiar with information about the subject that is not freely available. The tags should only be removed if these two issues can be resolved. Jenafalt (talk) 13:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Editors of the article work within the horticultural industry and are familiar with the company in question. Also the information is freely availiable on BAPLA if you would please look. The sources are a verified secondary source and are freely availiable on back catalogue through the referenced tv programme, magazine and newspaper. It is up to the reader to obtain the secondary sources for further notification. Please feel free to search the aforementioned references and find that that they are all accurate and highly verifiable; with special regard to the hessayon books as these are Highly availiable, this is the reason why this reference was chose. Please give regard to the fact that because this is a specialised subject there are not online scans of books and magazines etc citing the company in question because of course there won't be. There is however hundreds of physical copies of such references and as such a reference does not have to be purely online verifiable source; as you know the sources the editors have given are highly verifiable through respected books and authors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.210.114 (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please note that there are many many articles on wikipedia lacking online versions of secondary sources for immediate verification.They do not have to be directly linked to a website or web page. These sources do however need third party checking by obtaining the secondary sources mentioned but I can say with 100% confidence they are very accurate because as an avid academic in horticulture I have all of the publications in question and many more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpt Elder (talk • contribs) 15:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

If there is no further objections within the next few days (I agree with the above user cpt elder that the facts about sources on wikipedia are totally right) then the tags sgould be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.166.50 (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove the tags. The article has not changed - it still has not enough information to establish notability along the verifiable lines that I added to the article or independent sources that speak about the company. All of the information that I have found is merely a copy of promotional material put out by the company - very similar, in fact to the early edits of this page. There is still evidence of a significant conflict of interest, especially as those pushing so heavily for the removal of the tags have not contributed in other ways to Wikipedia see WP:SPA. If you want to remove the tags then edit the article in a way that establishes notability and invite other more established editors to help you with it (see WP:HELP) or add wiki links so that others who are not so closely involved in the horticultural industry will edit it. Jenafalt (talk) 07:16, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please refer to the following pages on notability. This page is about the notability of companies for inclusion on Wikipedia: WP:COMPANY. This is a page on general issues about notability: WP:NOTE. If the article cannot meet these notability guidelines then there is a good chance it will be deleted. I have done several searches to try to establish notability but have been unable to find any appropriate sources according to these guidelines. Please help by adding appropriate sources. Thanks. Jenafalt (talk) 07:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notability

Jenafalt a number of experienced wikipedia editors, academics and authors and both verified and certified the sources as well as the purpose and need for the page. The secondary sources ARE suitable. hundreds of company articles have secondary sources outside the internet and are more than verifiable, please take the time to ensure you take this in to consideration and look. As well as this many other articles now have links within them to the article in question; therefore leading to the conclusion that other wikipedia authors find the company a necessary and valuable contribution to the community with the correctly cited sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.211.143 (talk) 11:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have given you links to show what appropriate sources are needed for the article to make it notable. I have been unable to find any myself after extensive searches. Please add them yourself if you have them. Only then should the tag be removed. Jenafalt (talk) 11:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Garden World Images. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic