Talk:Gantiadi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Location Map edit

In this article it is already shown other map depicting Gagra's location in Abkhazia, two similar maps is not relevant, will be better if we add its location in Georgia, as it's done in other articles. --g. balaxaZe 13:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Replied here. Alæxis¿question? 07:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rename (2014) edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

TsandryphshGantiadi – Per WP:COMMONNAME, in this article main title must be Gantiadi, I've searched uses of both names in Google books and in Ngram Viewer, result is that ► Ngram; books: Greater Sochi, Global Security Watch, Collected translations on archaeology, Annual Report of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, General Hydrogeology. So as we can see in Ngram there is no data about Tsandriphsh and Gantiadi is widely used in books, thus Gantiadi is 100% more common in English than any other and the article must be renamed and moved. --Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC) --g. balaxaZe 18:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Weak support It's an extremely massive stretch to claim that Gantiadi is widely used anywhere, but three of the book examples above are from the 21st century, and they all use it at least once. CMD (talk) 16:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Actually it's also very easy to find a few books that use the name Tsandripsh: The Abkhazians: A Handbook by George Hewitt, Routledge 2013, Encyclopedia of Caves by William B. White and David C. Culver, Academic Press, 2012. I've found them using one Google Books query, there haven't made it to the ngram because they are too new. Alæxis¿question? 10:27, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Weak argument for oppose, no one says that Tsandripsh isn't used but for English-speaking world Gantiadi is more common and widely used. (Also one of your listed books The Abkhazians: A Handbook by George Hewitt, Routledge 2013 also inculed Gantiadi name, here is a copied text: "Sea Gwmsta Gumista Gechrypsh, K1'alashwyr K'elasur Gechripsh, Leselidze Gwlrypsh Gulrypsh, Gulripsh Tsandripsh, Gantiadi Kw'dry K'odor Pitsunda Ochamchyra Ochamchira" what one more time proves that Gantiadi is more known.).--g. balaxaZe 19:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ah, different transliterations. That somewhat nullifies the source discrepancies that led to my support. Quite a few of the same books are popping up in both searches, and as before there's a paucity of English sources in the area in general, so it's hard to see either as currently dominant. Are there any other transliterations for both languages? CMD (talk) 00:40, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
WP:COMMONNAME, Ngram clearly shows dominance. It isn't transliteration CMD --g. balaxaZe 20:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
What? Every name that has been mentioned here is a transliteration. CMD (talk) 13:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I meant they are two different names, and Gantiadi is more wide used.--g. balaxaZe 15:30, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
That's irrelevant to the question I asked. I take it Gantiadi is the only Georgian transliteration then? CMD (talk) 15:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 10 April 2015 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Harej (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)Reply



TsandryphshGantiadi – Per above rename request and also Google books Ngram viewer common name (see WP:COMMONNAME) of this setllement is Gantiadi and not Tsandryphsh. (p.s. Gantiadi is the only Georgian transliteration) g. balaxaZe 10:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

What has changed since the request for rename a year ago? The ngram still contains info only up to 2008 and I've listed newer books that contain the Abkhazian variant of the name. Alæxis¿question? 18:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
What has changed? Previous request had no consensus but that doesn't mean it won't be reached now. And also I answered that Gandiati is the only Georgian transliteration. Ngram shows name popularity in English and even till 2008 Gantiadi is more common so per WP:COMMONNAME article's name must be changed to Gantiadi. --g. balaxaZe 17:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Consensus is unlikely to change in a year without any new arguments. Ngram for some reason only indexes data up to 2008, and I've listed a couple of newer books that use the name Tsandripsh during the previous rename request discussion. Therefore, oppose. Alæxis¿question? 19:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
There is no need in other arguments everything is per WP:COMMONNAME requirements --g. balaxaZe 17:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gantiadi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply