Talk:Fullerton, Louisiana
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Otr500 in topic Unproductive edits
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fullerton, Louisiana article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Louisiana may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Unproductive edits edit
- The lead was changed, purported as "Resolved an ungrammatical use of "around".". I am not sure what improvements this is actually meant to implement but it did not make any sentence improvements. What it did do was use the name of the town at the beginning of the second sentence, that was used in the first sentence, and there was no change in paragraphs or reasoning, such as a need for clarification, to use the name twice. It is redundant, and sort of assuming that readers must have Alzheimer's.
- Someone explain to me how "based around" is a grammatical improvement over "developed around". Fullerton was actually "developed" by the mill and built on specific criteria of the company and mandates at the time. The town (that would still be Fullerton by-the-way) was designed and actually built around the mill so; literally was built on a plan around the mill. Otr500 (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)