Talk:Full House/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Initial text (later blanked by author)
Why must people insist on reverting the old version when I edit the cast list to list Michelle Tanner as the single name Mary Kate Ashley Olsen? This is how the Olsen twins were officially credited on TV.
- This was my comment before I was a registered user. I have now withdrawn my comments for now. —Mr. Grinch 14:56, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Could someone please create the articles about the characters from this show? The cast list looks like a lot of red, and I'm not sure I like it. — [[User:33451|Mr. Grinch (Talk)]] 14:56, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Editing to Links section
I did some minor editing to the links section: I moved the official site to the bottom, because despite the fact that it IS the official site, it's sorta obvious they just made it and left it and would not be the best place to find info about the show. They haven't updated for years. I also moved TV.com to second-to-bottom because the TV.com template limits some content such as downloads of songs, etc.
- I moved the official page back to the top. It may not be updated at all, but it's generally Wikipedia style to keep official pages at the top. Also, I removed links to the two forums, because links to the websites are already present, and it's redundant to include the forum links as well. ral315 15:22, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
I moved links...again. I moved Full House Aloha lower than the official page, and added howrude.org.
Changed howrude.thatsanderskid.com to howrude.org, because of hosting problems I think it'd be easier to list that instead of editing it everytime a new host is found. -corndogs211
Books
There were some books based on the FH episodes written. Is anybody able to collect the titles and write something about it ? (Annamaria95 15:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC))
Quoting Uncle Joey
He's not Uncle Joey; Joey is Danny's BFF, not his brother.
A: There's always a 'chance'. Don't quote me on this, but it would be difficult to try and re-negotiate with the producers, actors and the studio. So I feel strongly that it would never happen.
Way to quote him there, f****ts. What do you think don't quote me means? --Boycottthecaf 21:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Okayyy... I think he said it figuratively and didn't really mean it word for word. We could ask if he ever visited this article (as if), I also censored some of the stuff you had up... Badlands17 21 August 2005
Reunion?
The article states about "another reunion episode". Isn't this kind of misleading considering that there wasn't one reunion episode? Flyerhell 07:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Their address and phone number do not belong in the synopsis
I agree, on first look, that their phone number and adress is really unnecessary. Who really cares? Does that have anything to do with the plot of the show? However, these small extra tidbits of info really aren't hurting anything...
Cancellation
It has not been mentioned how Full House was cancelled.
What do you mean how it was cancelled? Is there a story behind it or the show just went off the air? Flyerhell 19:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Yes its cancelled
Can you cite a source to back up your claim? If not then it won't be mentioned.
From the E! True Hollywood Story on Full House, Mary Murphy (Senior Writer from TV Guide) says : "In the end, the reason Full House was canceled was that too much money was being spent, 1.3 million an episode, and so much money on performers that had been there for 8 years..."
And John Stamos says "The show kinda got prematurely canceled...'"[1] --Weakmassive 06:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Also, John Stamos did not want to continue, and he was a focal point of it all.Dshibshm (talk) 05:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
John kind of talked out of both sides of his mouth then. I vaguely remember what was said on the E! special about the show becoming too expensive. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Episode Articles
These episode artiles are really bad currently. Nick at night currently plays Full House episodes in episode order. I want everybody to go out there, watch the episodes and write synopsises! Thank You, --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 06:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- I recently wrote one for Our Very First Telethon. WAVY 10 16:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Ain't
Do any of the three Tanner girls ever say "ain't" on this show? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.202.26.44 (talk • contribs) .
- Please rember that this was made in the late 80's, early 90's and they didn't have the word "ain't". --GeorgeMoney T·C 22:49, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Not sure I should grace you with a reply (given your very "creative" signature), but a short google search for "ain't dictionary" will (or would) inform you that ain't came into being in the 18th century. --jae 02:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- I have changed my sig due to this. --GeorgeMoney T·C 03:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Villian
Who's the villian of this show? Is it Stephanie?
- Kimmy Gibbler is.
- I know, I know! Comet the dog. TripleH1976 11:50 a.m., 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I really doubt there's a villian on this show. -corndogs211
It should be more like a person who just annoyes people. In the First Season, it's michelle. In the second season, its still Michelle. Also, Becky and Jesse's relationship can also be stated as a "Villian". Yeah, Kimmy Gibbler is probably 100% the villian. Uncle Jesse probably thinks Comet is a villian, as Comet likes his bed so much. --haha169 18:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
There really isn't a villian, but there are something like antagonists in separate episodes when something gets ruined. As in one episode (sorry don't know the title) Nicky and Alex destroy Michelle's diorama, so they would be the "villians". Or would it be the parents? Mooski Magnus 02:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- That's just it - not every show has to have a villain.
- The conflicts possible are man vs. man, nature, himself, or God. (My former teacher would be proud :-) In a sitcom, the emphasis is on man vs. man situations - at times there are different situations which need resolved, but as Mooski Magnus notes, it's more like a different antagonist in each episode. The nature depends on the situation. And, "comedy" sort of denotes that it's going to be light, meaning, it's unlikely you could see a true "villain" in a family sitcom. Even a schoolyard bully in some others is more an antagonist, unless they're in like every episode.
John Stamos Article
Let's create an article on John Stamos.
There is one. Did you create it? John Stamos
Goofs
In the goofs section it says that Wrestlemania has never been hosted in Pittsburgh when I clearly remember it being there a couple years ago. I would put it on there but I forget what year it was exactly. WrestleMania was never in Pittsburgh. Vince would never go to a pathetic place like Pittsburgh for WrestleMania. By the way PITTSBURGH SUCKS AND SO DO THE STEELERS.TG 50 14:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
stupid
Yeah. What does that have to do with the article?
WAVY 10 00:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's not a goof, anyway, becasue "Full House," like other TV shows, exists in a universe not quite like our own, becasue there is a family that doesn't exist in our own. As long as things are grossly out of line (The Chicago Cubs winning the World Series, for instance - unless it's a show about alternate universes or there is some specific reason given like a character impacting that) it should be accepted as canon for that universe. And, there is *no* valid reason why, in some similar but parallel universe, there could *not* have been a WWF event in Pittsburgh on that date.
Reunion
Leaked internal notices from ABC reveal a reunion movie is scheduled for the Fall of 2007. All stars will be returning except for the Olsen twins, who sources say have demanded too much money to do the 2 hour dramedy reunion special.
- Mind if you source this? bibliomaniac15 21:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
----
== Fullhouse 2 ==
Are they considering to make a comeback ?'
You have wrong info
it air's in saudi arabia on MBC 4 MBC 2 is for movies
Episode Quotations
Which episode has the quotation "and no TV" in Full House? Which season is that?( pretty much every episode have that)--Mathsexpressions 20:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
I need a script excerpt
Which episode of Full House has a script that has the line "For the rest of the day you're gonna be in your room and no TV."? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.10.200.101 (talk) 06:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC).
That line is from the episode "The Devil Made Me Do It", which aired during season five. Gabrielkat 00:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Why is everything pertaining to this show (and especially Bob Saget's character) getting the snot vandalized out of it? I had to get the Danny Tanner page semi-protected last month and I'm beginning to think that we may need to do so with this page.
I also recommend banning those (temporarily) who tried to slam this page with a bunch of crud.
Yeah, what's with the whole "Danny the Fanny" and "Bob the Faggot Saget" stuff?
Criticism
Shouldn't there be a "Criticism" section? I'm sure "Full House" has had its share of criticism due to many people thinking that it isn't "real enough".
- Probably, but first we need to address the incessant vandalism. WAVY 10 14:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Plus such a section would be a original research and vandalism magnet. PMA 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- The problem with criticism of this show is that much of it, if looked at one way, is wrong but loooked at another way, is not. Same with goofs. Unless one phrases it just right - i.e.: "No specifics were ever given as to how Jesse Katsopolis faked his graduation - it will lead to big arguments. Yes, they did a retcon and said that Jesse dropped out. But, Jesse is the only person who ever talked about it, so he *could*have*lied*. It's just that nobody ever thinks about that. So, by saying, "Jesse first graduated, then he dropped out," someone else will be able to come right back and said, "No, he lied about graduating, his visit back to the school was a ploy, etc.."
- See what I mean? I think the best way to say it with cricisms and goofs like that is that there were a variety of retcons that could be viewed in one of several ways," or "The number of retcons require very creative thinking to explain." or, "When taken literally, some things appear to be goofs that weren't if looked at in antoher way." But, I don't know how to get more specific than that, and I don't know exactly how to phrase it so it makes sense for an encyclopedia. We frankly don't know what the writers were thinking, but they 8could* have decided, when doing the retcon, that it was plausible that Jesse *lied*.
- Which is why a bunch of fans got together and produced something that explained all that in the first place.
- Plus such a section would be a original research and vandalism magnet. PMA 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
"Funnyish"
Not a word befitting an encyclopedia. Please remove all instances.
142.161.113.129 22:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Disney Channel appearances...
About this statement...
- Members of the Full House cast have appeared on Disney Channel shows four times:
- Candace Cameron in That's So Raven as Courtney Dearborn; credited as Candace Cameron Bure.
- (Episode: Teacher's Pet)
- Mary-Kate Olsen and Ashley Olsen in Sister, Sister as themselves. (Episode: Slime Party)
- Dave Coulier in The Thirteenth Year as Whit Griffin.
- Dave Coulier in The Even Stevens Movie as the host of Gotcha!, Lance LeBow.
I don't think the Sister, Sister one counts since the show was airing on the WB at the time, and only airs in reruns on Disney Channel. The way this is written implies that this show was one that originated on the channel. WAVY 10 12:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
This page needs fixed again, because it was vandalized.. I'm trying but I'm not very good with Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 (talk • contribs)
- It's fixed. -- Gogo Dodo 17:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Episode Articles
I am adding infoboxes to the FH episode articles. WAVY 10 14:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
John Stamos in Starring Role
How come John Stamos gets his name under "Starring" instead of Bob Saget? 71.111.247.186 01:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Casting order, notoriety, audience draw...who knows? WAVY 10 13:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Semi-protect request
I noticed today how much nonsense (ex.: Ashley Tisdale and Britney Spears being added to the Guest Star list). I requested semi-protection for this page. WAVY 10 00:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
That's as stupid and unnecessary as the show.
Recurring theme - growing up
I don't know if it was there but then removed because of the vandalism, but I found it stunning that this was not mentioned. It is one of the few shows to have the children act like children, and not adults, on a consistent basis, though others have done so a little. If marriage is only mentioned a few times and is listed at a recurring theme, then this should be, also.
I hope it looks good the way I did it - the first paragraph admittedly is more certain to fit there than my second, dealing with one episode, but I think that episode is important in that the childrens' reactions to the first date are quite relevant and would be glossed over on some shows. Hey, as noted in paragraph 3, this is one of the few shows ever to note that the deceased mother even existed. I think, though I'm not sure of this, there are more mentions of the deceased mother here than in every other show with a widower *combined*. (Andy Griffith, My Three Sons, Diff'rent Strokes, etc.)
Agreed, but I would qualify that part of the first paragraph as such: "It is one of the few shows (in more recent years)to have the children act like children, and not adults, on a consistent basis..."
Just a comment. WAVY 10 14:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
P.S.: Please remember to sign.
Thanks - hmmm, I thought it automatically signed when you were signed in. I'm pretty new to posting on talk. Ah, here, I see below the "save page" part. I hadn't scrolled down that far.DTF955 21:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
One minor issue about the article
The "History of the Show" section talks about "four main characters" being added to the lineup but only lists three characters by name. Someone care to fix that please? Thanks --Drmike 00:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Results
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The result was to merge Full house books into Full house. -- My Account (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Final Episode (1-hour finale)
How is the final episode called? --83.228.137.68 17:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- "Michelle Rides Again"Dshibshm (talk) 05:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Multiple airings per week during original run
Sometime around 1989, ABC did a thing that NBC also did with Quantum Leap around that time, running the episodes on at least two different nights to build up the audience. I don't have a cite to prove it, though, relying instead on my distinct memory of their doing this, because that's how I ended up watching both shows in college. Anyone have a cite for this? Lawikitejana (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- You can use old tv schedules as a source. --78.86.159.199 (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Setting
This section in the article has been added saying 'most of the show was filmed [in San Fransisco]'. I read somewhere that most of the sets were in LA and the only time they actually shot in San Fransisco was Comet's Excellent Adventure. Does anyone have a source to back this up? Mouseinthehouse (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Found it! It was in the production section of the article. I deleted the Setting part as it had only just been added. It is here in case somebody objects:
The setting is in a large house located in San Francisco. Most of the show is filmed here.
Thanks! Mouseinthehouse (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Redundancy in first paragraph
I was about to change one of the lines that listed the airing dates in the first paragraph, as this is listed twice, but noticed that each link goes to a different article. Is there a way we can rearrange the first paragraph to only state the original dates once while keeping the important links? Shdwninja8 (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh my God a catchphrase?
It is wrong for Oh my God to be considered Danny's catchphrase. Not only did the other characters use the phrase "Oh my God", but half of the English speaking world also use Oh My God regularly. It's like calling "How are you?" or "I'm Hungry" a catchphrase. A catchphrase is one that is unique to that character and not a phrase that is as common as "Hey there". Besides the aforementioned, there is no citation to back up the claim that Oh My God is Danny's catchphrase, so if there is no objections, please remove it or at least try to dig up a more obvious catch phrase used by Danny, there are loads. --78.86.159.199 (talk) 22:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that it shouldn't be a catchphrase (though it's probably the closest Danny ever got to having one). WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 18:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
User:Wikipedia is Communism
Watch out for his puppets!Glad he has been banned but his sockpuppets aren't! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AJ44 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- What?Lots42 (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline.Ikip (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Theme song
What is the source for John Stamos writing the theme song, and Rod Stewart singing? According to the Season 1 DVD commentary of the pilot, Jeff Franklin, Jesse Frederick and Bennett Salvay wrote the theme (not John Stamos), and Jesse Frederick sang the theme song (not Rod Stewart). (talk) 04:05, 27 November, 2008 (UTC)
Michelle Smiling was not the Theme Song "Everywhere You Look" Was I did not add that information. --Gertie1999 (talk) 13:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999 :O)
Main Characters?
>"During the show's run, only four main characters were added to the main cast."
The section then lists Rebecca, Nicky and Alex... that's three. Also, did Kimmy and Steve not get main credits recognition at some point during the show's run? That defines main character to me... That makes at least five. TheHYPO (talk) 08:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- You're right on Kimmy and Steve being counted as main characters. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that would make five characters added. However, since Nicky and Alex were always listed together, the person who wrote that sentence probably counted them as one and wrote four instead of a correct five. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.184.224.135 (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
I notice that this conversation was made in 2009, but I made this Michelle Tanner Character aricle in 2010 I don't know who Steve is since I barely Have seen any episodes of season 8 so if someone will list him I won't mind.--Gertie1999 (talk) 01:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Gertie1999:O)
Tone
The tone of this article is all wrong. It implies that the Tanners are a fictional family. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 05:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
This article reads as if written by a fan who watched every episode and bought all the fan memorabilia. The chatty tone and lack of behind the scenes details (production history being a big one) don't read like an encyclopedia article at all. Other questions are left unanswered, such as why, when the cast was well known to be friendly with each other even off-set, are so many of the original cast members not interested in a reunion movie? And why are only the adults listed as "main protagonists"? Including one who wasn't even an original cast member? That doesn't make sense. The previous comment doesn't make sense, either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.31.21.15 (talk) 16:00, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree with the poster above. It seems like a Fanboy wrote this page for Full House.--72.154.193.183 (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- I also agree. I'm going to make a push over the next few days and work on it. --132 19:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- As if lines like "(Information from the Full House Wikipedia page not mine)" didn't give that away...128.187.97.2 (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Changing of the basement
While catching reruns recently, I noticed that the basemen and layout of the house has changed drasitcally throughout the seasons. We have the basement as regular storage than Joey's bedroom, then most recenly Jesse's recording studio. Also the assigned bedroom changes and the conversion of the attic to Jesse/Becky home. Somehow this could be formed into a subsection, even photos of the house if possible. --Cooly123 20:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs)
Vandalism
Someone Vandalized this Page, I'm guessing with Jodie Sweetin in the news someone thought it'd be funny to vandalize this page, I'd revert it but I don't know how... Help? Souper Chiva (talk) 23:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
it currently airs in norway
on tv norge at least on saturdays. www.tvnorge.no —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.111.248 (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Requested Semi-Protection
I request the semi-protection of this article after numerous IP addresses have been repeatedly vandalised and un-useful edits to the cast and character names. Mr.Television (talk) 04:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- The template you put at the top is for when the article is already semi-protected, and someone not auto-confirmed wants to edit the article. The way to request semi-protection is at WP:RPP. I'll take a look now and see if a request there seems warranted. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- After checking, I disagree with the need for semi-protection. Not only do I only see a few vandalizing edits in the last few days, I also see legitimate, useful info being added by IPs. Note, for example, that the last change you reverted (the overlinking) wasn't vandalism, it just wasn't necessary, and I can see why someone might misunderstand that. Page protection should really be done if the amount of damage being done (i.e., the amount of time it takes to monitor and revert bad edits) outweighs the positive contributions by IPs. If the vandalism gets worse, please file a report at WP:RPP. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for clearing that up, I'm new to the term of Semi-Protection. Have a nice day. Mr.Television (talk) 08:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Edit request on 7 October 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to update the information regarding Buddy's (aka Comet's) age and cause of death to the following:
In February 1998, Buddy died in his sleep of complications from a form of cancer. A stray, Buddy was believed to have been 9 1/2 to 10 years old. [1][2]
198.91.10.180 (talk) 14:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Already done. It's already present at the end of the Cast section. --Stfg (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
References
- ^ Tribune News Services (February 13, 1998). "Athletic Canine Star Of `Air Bud' Film Dies". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved October 7, 2013.
- ^ "'Air Bud' Star Dies Of Cancer". The Spokesman-Review. February 13, 1998. Retrieved October 7, 2013.
Edit request
I think it should be mentioned that the suffix "-polis" means "city" and that "Katsopolis" is not a person's surname. No Greek I know has delusions of municipality.
Nonetheless, that is the spelling used on the series. You'd think Stamos would have said something.
But I guess one would also have expected Alex Karras to get his character's name on Webster (George Papadopolis) to have the non-silly suffix. Paul Austin (talk) 07:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Well, as I'm sure you're aware, "-opoulos" is a common suffix in Greek names, meaning "descendant of". I would assume the original writers of the show(s) just misspelled the names, going with a purely phonetic interpretation. Your point about Stamos and Karras not saying anything is interesting, but then, neither are really known for their incredible talents and rigorous standards. I'd assume they were happy to have good jobs at that point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.159.20 (talk) 03:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Editing This Page
As part of a course, our webpage is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_Program_talk:Cornell_University/Online_Communities_(Fall_2014) me and some of my colleagues have decided to edit this wikipedia page. My group's usernames are as follows: User: Kidd_hudi and User: Im257
New Threads: We would like to create a new section entitled, "The Original Modern Family" that discusses the varying ways in which Full House was the first 'Modern Family' on television, as well as the social impact of this television course.
Editing Sections: We would also like to expand on new current threads of each character's section, such as to look at the back stories of the characters more thoroughly. Im257 (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi folks. Here are some suggestions for your article:
- There exist pages in Wikipedia for each of the characters. The article here includes links to those pages, and there is probably no need to duplicate the information.
- Do you know where you are going to get the sources for discussing how full house was the first modern family? Are these reliable sources?
- Look at the top of the talk page that suggests improvements, such as a plot summary is needed. I suggest that you also look at other TV series articles that are at a higher level and learn what you might need to do to improve the quality of this one.
- Happy editing! LeshedInstructor (talk) 18:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Potential revival series — appropriate or not?
User 216.67.78.43 feels the section is not appropriate in the article, citing that it is rumor and "not a sure thing" in edits made which removed the section [2] [3] [4]. While there appears to be plenty of interest to bring about such a revival series, as stated in the reference provided for that section, it is anything but a sure thing. This recent article dated January 26 indicates no signs a revival series is coming to fruition: "Rumors the cast was considering a reunion shot fired up last summer, with many speculating a return for nearly all the cast in an updated version of the show. There has yet to be any confirmation that such a reunion is in the works, or that any plans for one truly exist."
Per WP:CRYSTAL, we must avoid any speculative details in the article, for a show termed to be a "potential" revival of a popular sitcom from the 1980s and 1990s. I do see the section's relevance, as it is part of a bigger section titled Reunions, and past viewers of the show are curious on what is happening today with its cast members. Still, with no firm word about any production of, or participation in, this revival series—even Lori Loughlin (Rebecca Donaldson-Katsopolis) says she was in the dark about such a project [5]—I am on the fence about the appropriateness of the section. Maybe it needs to be updated with the latest from that article I just found. Or should it be removed altogether? MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sources indicate that the series will be called Fuller House and set to air on Netflix. Reports are conflicting, but I've added it to the article with two main sources. If the wording needs to be changed then please do so. Npamusic (talk) 01:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, that's one source. TVLine.com (who?), citing "sources", reports it. Variety reports that TVLine reported it and that Netflix has denied it. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, Netflix never "denied" anything, they simply stated it was a rumor. If it was a "rumor" then why are major and higly cited news outlets reporting on it from TVLine's source? Even The Wrap is reporting on it, as well as Entertainment Weekly and 100+ other outlets reporting this. Netflix has not responded to any of their inquires about the series. Does not mean it's been "denied" by the company. I'd be hard pressed to see to it that you use The Wraps source as seems to be the most plausible. Also, they, as well as Variety are citing TVLine as the first to break the news. This isn't unlike the "highly unknown" / "poorly cited" site Latino-Review breaking major casting and directing news that highly cited sites like Variety, Deadline, Hollywood Reporter, among others cite as the first to break the news. It's not un-common. Can we bring someone in here that actually has a knowledge on this subject matter and the guidelines that go with Wikipedia? Please? thanks. Npamusic (talk) 05:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, that's one source. TVLine.com (who?), citing "sources", reports it. Variety reports that TVLine reported it and that Netflix has denied it. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sources indicate that the series will be called Fuller House and set to air on Netflix. Reports are conflicting, but I've added it to the article with two main sources. If the wording needs to be changed then please do so. Npamusic (talk) 01:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Rebecca Donaldson-Katsopolis (hyphen or no hyphen?)
I was scratching my head with this edit. When I did a simple Google search, I did see the hyphen between Donaldson and Katsopolis in some cases, and no hyphen in others. I reverted the edit because it broke the link in the List of Full House characters article, which has no hyphen for the name, but I also indicated in the edit summary the punctuation addition was unsourced. The article on Lori Loughlin also shows no hyphen for the character she portrayed (which also wikilinks to the List of Full House characters page). As the Google search yielded both with and without the hyphen, I am not convinced that the hyphen is needed, and because of how the name is presented in other Wikipedia articles, there should be no change to how it's presented here. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Undue weight to gossip about the spin off
The section about the spin off is gratuitously thick with blow by blow minutia and rumors and "confirmations" and "reveals" about the plans for the spin off and needs to be seriously cut down. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Full House. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.wetpaint.com/news/gallery/full-house-where-are-they-now-photos/photo/buddy-the-dog-comet
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Full House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606172746/http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2008/12/04/john_stamos_planning_a_full_house_remake to http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2008/12/04/john_stamos_planning_a_full_house_remake
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111013151643/http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/item_8lnCqGE8QIrovlMU6TUGBJ to http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/item_8lnCqGE8QIrovlMU6TUGBJ%3Bjsessionid%3D78F5714E0CAB8565FAB4F59730387953
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Full House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719081249/http://www.dvdorchard.com.au/productfound.asp?Qno=TBCTIC0TPC0&SearchString=Full+House&S1=True&S2=True&S3=False&NoCache=0.7805139 to http://www.dvdorchard.com.au/productfound.asp?Qno=TBCTIC0TPC0&SearchString=Full+House&S1=True&S2=True&S3=False&NoCache=0.7805139
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Jesse Cochran/Katsopolis
He wasn't "Katsopolis" when it started, that's Retroactive continuity. It is NOT our job to reflect the producers' acting as if Oceania was always at war with Eastasia. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- He was Katsopolis for seven out of eight seasons. The section title on his character in List of Full House and Fuller House characters is Katsopolis, and Jesse Katsopolis redirects to that section. A last name that was retconned to Katsopolis and never mentioned again after season one doesn't belong in the lead as a pipe link since for the overwhelming majority of the show he was referred to as Katsopolis. AldezD (talk) 03:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- the suffix -polis means city so John Stamos must have had municipal aspirations ;) Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 06:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- What does that have to do with this discussion about how the character's last name is presented in the lead? AldezD (talk) 12:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- the suffix -polis means city so John Stamos must have had municipal aspirations ;) Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 06:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)